fbpx

Get ready for an exciting announcement for the melanoma community

  • Days
  • Hours
  • Minutes

Funded Research

Modulating p53 Transcriptional Activity to Reduce Melanoma Brain Metastasis

Modulating p53 Transcriptional Activity to Reduce Melanoma Brain Metastasis

Modulating p53 Transcriptional Activity to Reduce Melanoma Brain Metastasis

Venkata Saketh Sriram Dinavahi, PhD

Mentor Gavin Robertson, PhD; Sheri Holmen, PhD; Arthur Berg, PhD
Award Type Career Development Award
Institution Penn State University College of Medicine
Donor Support Funded by the NYC Gala Fund-a-Grant

Description:

Successful management of melanoma will require eliminating both the primary cancer as well as its spread. The survival of melanoma patients reduces significantly if the cancer spreads to the brain. Five-year patient survival after melanoma spreads to brain is only 5%. The key contributor for growth of melanoma is changes in a protein called BRAF. Similarly, the major factor that influences melanoma to spread to the brain is a protein called AKT. To reduce cancer spread, a number of novel treatments are currently being evaluated. Our hypothesis is that targeting the AKT and BRAF pathways will reduce both cancer as well as its spread to the brain, by increasing an important protein, called p53. One such treatment strategy to achieve this is inhibition of AKT and WEE1, WEE1 being a downstream protein in the BRAF pathway. We have previously shown that targeting AKT and WEE1 is superior to targeting either of the proteins alone in reducing melanoma development. Therefore, the central hypothesis of this project is to test the effect of p53-modulation on melanoma metastasis to the brain. The project will be accomplished by first identifying the best strategy to target the p53 pathway using genetic modifications and drugs. The best identified strategy will be tested for its effect on the p53 pathway and regulation of growth of melanoma cells. Finally, this strategy will be evaluated to decrease melanoma growth and its spread to brains in a mouse model. This discovery would identify unique approaches to overcome melanoma brain metastasis thereby improving the survival of patients.

Augmenting Melanoma Response to Immunotherapy via Commensal Microbiota

Augmenting Melanoma Response to Immunotherapy via Commensal Microbiota

Augmenting Melanoma Response to Immunotherapy via Commensal Microbiota

Matthew Griffin, PhD

Mentor Howard Hang, PhD
Award Type Career Development Award
Institution Rockefeller University

Description:

Cancer immunotherapy (CI) drugs activate our own immune system to directly kill cancer cells. These drugs have revolutionized how we treat many cancers including melanoma. However, not all patients respond equally to CI treatment, and we still do not fully understand why. Surprisingly, microorganisms in our gastrointestinal tract known collectively as the gut microbiota may be necessary for effective CI treatment. Melanoma, lung, and kidney cancer patients who responded to CI drugs contained a higher abundance of specific bacteria including Enterococci species compared to non-responding patients. These results suggest that individual bacterial species in the gut may improve CI therapy. Nevertheless, how this occurs is still unclear. In parallel, our laboratory has found that one Enterococcus species, Enterococcus faecium (Efm), can protect against infection by activating the immune system. Efm produces SagA, an enzyme that breaks down the bacterial cell wall to produce small molecules that stimulate innate immunity via the sensor Nod2. Based on these results, I hypothesize that Enterococcus species can also improve CI drug effectiveness through the direct activation of host immunity via a similar mechanism. To test this, I will first examine how colonization of the GI tract with Enterococci can directly change the growth of melanoma in mice and alter immune cell activation within the tumor during CI treatment. To decipher how Enterococci can alter drug response, I will then test whether the SagA enzyme and the resulting small molecule it produces are sufficient to improve CI drug effectiveness against melanoma. Finally, I will determine whether Enterococci-mediated melanoma suppression also requires the host sensor Nod2. Together, these experiments will provide direct evidence for how individual species of commensal bacteria can activate the host immune system during immunotherapy treatment of melanoma. Results from this proposal may allow us to predict how well patients will respond to CI drugs by detecting the presence of SagA-expressing Enterococci bacteria in their GI tract. Moreover, the microbial and host components I identify may provide new ways to improve clinically approved CI drugs via new probiotic or small molecule combination therapies. 

Role of PRAME in Epigenetic Reprogramming and Chromosomal Instability

Role of PRAME in Epigenetic Reprogramming and Chromosomal Instability

Role of PRAME in Epigenetic Reprogramming and Chromosomal Instability

Stefan Kurtenbach, PhD

Mentor J. William Harbour, MD
Award Type Career Development Award
Institution University of Miami

Description:

UM has a propensity to undergo early micrometastasis prior to treatment of the primary tumor, with later emergence of overt metastatic disease. Unfortunately, there has been no dramatic improvement in survival over the past half century. PRAME (Preferentially Expressed Antigen In Melanoma) is a gene that is usually only found in testis, is also found highly expressed in a variety of tumors. We have recently reported that PRAME does correlate with metastatic risk in UM, which is also true for many other cancer types including cutaneous melanoma. Besides the broad interest in PRAME, how PRAME promotes tumor progression and metastasis is not yet understood. In this proposal, we present preliminary data showing that PRAME is not only a biomarker for poor outcome, but plays a role in the formation of metastasis itself. We further show that PRAME expression may cause a defect in proper genomic DNA maintenance, which could be exploited for treatment with PARP inhibitors. Indeed, we present preliminary data for PARP inhibitors that is very promising, where UM cells expressing PRAME are more susceptible to PARP treatment. This proposal will cover two aims, where we intend to (1) generate a comprehensive map of where PRAME binds in the genome to regulate expression of genes involved in genomic instability and tumor progression, and (2) test PARP inhibitors for their suitability as a treatment option in our mouse metastasis model. For Aim 1, we will make use of a unique set of cell lines we have generated allowing for the inducible expression and knockdown of PRAME, including normal human uveal melanocytes, presenting a unique resource. Further, will use a variety of state-of-the-art next generation sequencing techniques to decipher the mechanism by which PRAME modulates gene expression. For Aim 2, we will utilize a mouse metastasis model we have established that allows for imaging of tumor growth and metastatic spread in live animals. Together, the results of this proposal will draw a detailed picture of how PRAME re-shapes the epigenetic landscape around genes important for tumor development, as well as exploit PRAME’s function in chromosomal maintenance for treatment using a mouse model, which could have a strong translational impact in the clinical setting.

Therapeutic Strategies to Induce Dormancy in Disseminated Melanoma Cells

Therapeutic Strategies to Induce Dormancy in Disseminated Melanoma Cells

Therapeutic Strategies to Induce Dormancy in Disseminated Melanoma Cells

Maria Sosa, PhD

Mentor Marisol Soengas, PhD
Award Type Career Development Award
Institution Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Donor Support Funded by the William H. Canon Foundation

Description:

Metastasis is the main cause of melanoma death. Current treatments mostly fail to cure metastasis. It is of common knowledge that disseminated cancer cells (DCCs) are the seeds of future metastasis. Once these DCCs arrive to secondary organs they undergo a dormancy program that involves cell cycle arrest or quiescence. DCCs could remain in this state for months to almost decades and they are able to survive current treatments. The reason is because most current therapies target anti-proliferative cells, thus dormant DCCs remain unaffected. Eventually these DCCs reactivate and they start forming metastases. After the detection of a melanoma lesion and treatment, patients enter a phase of remission in where no symptoms of disease are detectable and one can say that patients are “cured.” However, the majority of these patients will develop metastasis that will arise from DCCs. Clinical analyses suggest that dissemination of DCCs happens very early during melanoma progression. Therefore, understanding how DCCs enter dormancy and what makes them reactivate to form metastasis is of extreme significance to design novel treatments. We designed a protocol to reprogram tumor cells into long-term dormancy by combining an inhibitor of methylation plus retinoic acid. These reprogrammed dormant cells upregulated a transcription factor named NR2F1, which was responsible for the dormancy phase. We validated that NR2F1 could be used as a biomarker to determine dormancy status of DCCs in breast and prostate cancer patients. Moreover, the above-mentioned protocol is now part of a clinical trial to treat advanced cancer patients. In addition, previous results showed that patients with melanoma positive for a secreted factor named Midkine relapsed earlier than those patients that were negative for Midkine. Interestingly, when we blocked Midkine the levels of NR2F1 factor were upregulated reinforcing dormancy of DCCs and reducing metastasis formation. Thus, we propose a therapeutic strategy to keep those DCCs in a dormancy phase by blocking the reactivation signal (midkine) and inducing dormancy signals (NR2F1). We believe this treatment could stop DCCs from forming life-threatening metastases.